THE PENULTIMATE BETRAYAL
By Eugenia Richards
With
the publicizing of the documents on the joint work of the commissions of the
Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, finally
the forces of the antichrist and new world order have shown their cards. By having signed these documents unanimously,
our hierarchy deceived us. In the wake of the release of these documents in
June of 2005, there has been much outrage and dissention. At the outset of these dialogues, the effort
was made to persuade the general opinion of the flock that dialogue with the MP
was necessary for the sake of the common Russian people. The argument was even made that it was
the duty of the Church Abroad to “save” the MP. But those poor Russian people, who have
valiantly rejected the MP with its history of collaboration with a militantly
atheistic regime, which stamped out the truth of Christ and embodied the
darkness, betrayal, treachery and murderous methods of the soviet apparatus,
while dressing as bishops and feigning liturgies in state-sanctioned cathedrals
– these long-suffering poor Russian people have now been betrayed by a church
outside of Russia. We have put
ourselves in a position where soon we will no longer have dialogue, but
monologue, mandates, acts, directives, edicts – the path to totalitarian rule
in the church, soon to be headed by the supreme authority – alexei (a.k.a.
Drozdov), who will reserve the right of decision making in areas he deems to be
outside our expertise (which is an all-encompassing field), which will include
the major areas of property ownership, morality, political involvement,
membership in new world order organizations, concelebration with the Vatican
and other “confessions”. This will
entail not only the loss of ecclesiastical freedom, but the relinquishing of
personal freedom implemented through the very sacrament of confession and
church attendance. This will mean a total capitulation of the positions of our
holy predecessors and hierarchs who well defined the narrow path and raison
d'etre of the church abroad. This will be
a repeat of the overthrow of the Romanov Empire and the rewriting of its
history by the soviets, for as their demand requires that all statements made
over our eighty year history be deemed invalid (if they in any way stood in the
way of this diabolical unification). In
essence we will rewrite the glorious history of the remnant church abroad and
invalidate all of its positions, accomplishments and aspirations. We will
permit these maligners to mock our precious Metropolitans and Bishops, who
spoke out about the dangers of these apocalyptic times and the rush for mankind
to unite creating a footstool for the antichrist. Simultaneously, these “documents” attempt
to validate and rewrite sergianist history, making humanistic excuses for the
atrocities committed with the acquiescence of the sergianist
church, and not only diminishing just blame, but brazenly praising those
actions. They wish to enter into the pages of history those ugly decades of
persecutions of the faithful, torture in prisons and psychiatric hospitals as a
“misunderstanding” of sergianism.
Furthermore, the geopolitical interests of
What
shocking formulas are being presented to us in these documents? We have conceded on all issues – the
renunciation of sergianism, the renunciation of ecumenism, the withdrawal from
the WCC. The cunning, diabolical justifications for maintaining their grounds
are outrageous. Brazenly they quote “God
Himself” as having commanded that the gospels be preached throughout the
nations. But when the MP joined the WCC
in 1961 after the inglorious council of Bishops, when signatures were coerced
into endorsing the agenda and the lawless was made lawful, it was with the sole
purpose of obtaining a world platform to enable them to deny that they were
involved in the religious repression in their country. It was not to proselytize! They have conceded
nothing, but even more, they are now forcing their absolute totalitarian rule
over us in virtually all matters. It
appears that there was not a single voice among our hierarchy which was raised
to stay our ground. Furthermore, as they have demonstrated before, they deploy
the tactic of summoning up the silent supposed support of St. John of Shanghai,
implying that when he prayed for the armed forces during the Second World War,
he was in fact supporting the soviet regime. Having devised
the new “basic social conceptions” and the notion of “social expedience” these
principles will be applied as the new canonical framework for the actions of
the church (on the world stage).
These new guidelines lead us into syncretism with all world religions,
which as we were forewarned will develop the new religion of humanism and the
brotherhood of man, in preparation for the antichrist. As Bishop Nektary of
There
can only be unity with Christ, and if we are in unity with Christ, then we also
are in unity with those who are also in unity with Christ. But to be in unity with anyone and everyone –
unity at any price – this is not the unity we have been praying for, the true
unity, in truth, faith and love of Christ Who is the church. We do not disdain others who because of no
knowledge of Orthodoxy believe themselves to have faith in Christ. As Christians, we must not disdain any other
believers, for it is not ours to judge. This will be for the Lord to judge –
according to their knowledge. But if we
do not follow Him, then we have no unity with Him or His true followers. Unity is not something forged by man – unity
is a state which proceeds from the mystery which is in Truth. Documents and human decrees do not dictate or
forge reality. God is reality, and
everything that proceeds from Him is that is.
(I am that I am). But this truth
is under siege just as everything in the spiritual realm is constantly under
attack by evil. Now this worldly evil is
seeking to sink its teeth into the remnant of the church, as the dessert it
craved after devouring the faith in Holy Russia. It is obvious that this evil did not act on
its own, for their were human coconspirators. If these men (and women) knew of the staunch
conservative position of the ROCOR, why did they enter its ranks and even
assume ordained positions? If in
ideology they were in unity with the sergianists – WHY did they enter OUR
narrow doors? It would have been more
logical for them to simply enter the ranks of the mp. Why did they do their
clandestine work among us to attempt to make us radically change our
course? Do any of us have in our memory
the history of the church abroad, its struggles, its
resistance to the new humanism leading to antichrist? Do any of us dare to allow the memory of the
orthodox holocaust – the soviet revolution – fade into the past? Can any of us consciously support the willful
dissolution of our church as it has existed for eighty years and allow it not
only to pass into obscurity, but willfully annihilate its history? Do any of us wish to see a repeat of the
orthodox holocaust, the destruction of the memory of our bright hierarchs who
taught us that although we live in the world, we are not of this world?
Metropolitan Philaret lies incorrupt, witnessing even after death to the
anathema against ecumenism and his sorrowful epistles. We see the soviet style
repression and silencing of opposition being conducted today among our
clergy. Suspensions, ukazes have being
imposed to silence men of conscience who simply speak out against this
outrageous takeover. “Fear not the
ecumenists, fear the zealots”, is the new modus operandi. But the Lord warned the lukewarm of heart,
that they would be spit out! This new
persecution and repression is not historically or canonically correct – it
smacks of soviet style repression, for the laios, the believing body, often
spoke out in church history against the mistaken meanderings of the hierarchy.
In all of the bilateral agreements regarding
positions stated in these “statements” and “acts” there is the devious attempt
to throw in some scriptural passage to give these positions a warm and
humanistic aura. Yes, anyone can pull a
single holy passage from the scriptures and apply it as an absolute to achieve
their own interpretation and assessment of a specific situation. If the mp is now resorting to pulling
scriptural passages at random to achieve their own agenda, WHY over the course
of their 80 year history did they not allow the scriptures to be taught in
their own country, and now suddenly they quote the scriptures to lull us into a
false sense of brotherhood with them?
According to their Act on Canonical Communion, our bishops become
members of their Pomestny councils and will be instructed to act in a
conciliatory manner with fellow members (MP) – this is not autonomy – this is
amalgamation. They dare to say that
“through Divine Providence” the sergianist church produced martyrs. This bizarre perversion of the truth is
echoed by equally bizarre perversions of the truth throughout all statements
adopted by this dialogue participants. Paragraph by
paragraph, each outrageous claim and statement outdoes the last. The blatantly obvious shamelessness of these
statements is interspersed with statements designed to placate the bewildered
reader, such as, but of course “the Orthodox Church excludes any possibility of
liturgical communion with the non-Orthodox...NONETHELESS...it may be
appropriate to participate in socially meaningful ceremonies in which other
confessions are represented.” READ
BETWEEN THE LINES!
These
“documents” read like dictatorial plans from soviet archives. Who has permitted our church to be destroyed
and sold to the MP? For it is obvious
that if these documents will be ratified, surely, more definitive “acts”,
“subcommittees”, “commissions” will follow which will entrench the supreme
authority of
We
have written, pleaded, spoken out and prayed.
We continue to observe the unceasing ecumenical activities of the MP. On April 27th
the
Sources:
*Andrew, Christopher, “The Sword and the Shield – The Mitrokhin File and the Secret History of the KGB (USA, Basic Books, 1999)
**Barron, John, “KGB TODAY – The Hidden Hand” (New York, Berkley Books, 1985)
Ellis, Jane, “The Russian Orthodox Church – A Contemporary History” (Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 1986)
Albats, Evgenia, “The State within a State” (New York, Farrar-Straus-Giroux, 1994)